- #Macs fan control yc hacker reddit full
- #Macs fan control yc hacker reddit pro
- #Macs fan control yc hacker reddit software
#Macs fan control yc hacker reddit full
I don't really have a problem with this, at idle my computer is using ~100W, at full load, it's nearly 1000W. This results in a similar effect as a laptop fan - under heavy load, the machine is loud. I have my fans basically idle when temperatures permit it, but aggressively ramp them to full speed to keep the CPU as cool as possible so as to allow the frequency to scale up beyond spec. Kind of depends on the steady state and your target turbo frequency. > a well cooled desktop just doesn't have these issues Which for most people, including myself, is more of a reason not to buy it. I think the intent is for it to be basically an "upmarket" alternative to the Air, but they only thing they have to offer right now is a Touch Bar. I have no idea while it still exists though.
#Macs fan control yc hacker reddit pro
I think the low-end Pro came to existence because they intended it to replace the Air, but the tiny 12" MacBook had already claimed the unadorned "MacBook" name, which would have made a lot more sense.īut then they ended up refreshing the Air as people just never stopped buying the old one, despite its ageing internals and garbage 2010-era screen (possibly because it was the only computer Apple were selling at the time with a keyboard that worked). The last time an entry level MacBook Pro made sense was 2015, where you got a noticeably higher TDP chip (28W vs 15W in the Air iirc-could be mistaken), more IO (two Thunderbolt 2 ports vs the Air's 1, and a full-size HDMI port), and of course an IPS retina screen. That lower-spec Pro has never made much sense. > Two more usb-c but you can only hook in one external monitor!Īctually you still only get two USB-C ports on the M1 MacBook Pro. X-Windows: …There’s got to be a better way. X-Windows: …The problem for your problem.
#Macs fan control yc hacker reddit software
X-Windows: …The first fully modular software disaster. X-Windows: …The cutting edge of obsolescence. X-Windows: …Putting new limits on productivity. X-Windows: …It could be worse, but it’ll take time. X-Windows: …Ignorance is our most important resource. X-Windows: …Complex non-solutions to simple non-problems. X-Windows: …Flaky and built to stay that way. X-Windows: …Don’t get frustrated without it. X-Windows: …A mistake carried out to perfection.
On the flip side, it required a lot of up-front investment to get it to this point. Having used the default macOS experience a few times at work (on machines far more powerful than my dinky laptop), I can assure you that my highly customized setup feels far more responsive. Personally, I run Linux with a tiling window manager and lots of custom keybindings and little scripts. If you want the best experience on macOS, you don't need to be technical. Of course, that's exactly macOS's advantage. As a result of these and many other factors, Linux's desktop UX remains far less optimized when compared to macOS's desktop UX.Īs with most of Linux's rough edges, however, this is trivially fixable if you're technical enough.
Also, there are many competing interests working on the kernel who might oppose kernel-level optimizations which favor desktop usage at the cost of, for example, server usage. Not to mention, there are multiple competing groups of GUI people in the Linux community making coordination across these levels difficult. Unfortunately, there isn't as much communication between the GUI people and the kernel people in the Linux community as there is between those same groups at Apple Inc.
0 kommentar(er)
